Could anything at all be more important than what he did and said about his body and blood? ET on EWTN. All donations are greatly appreciated. What is perhaps an even larger problem, though, is that arguments against transubstantiation based on appearance seem to work equally well against the Incarnation of the Son of God. Or does one need to receive the Blood of Christ as well? Trump making 'frivolous' claims of voter fraud: Nevada AG This ought to be our behavior to the Eucharistic mysteries too. If Paul is handing on a tradition, we ask where it comes from. Like the apostles, we have faith in the Lord’s words, that he meant what he said; but, also like the apostles, we will never fully understand those words. Nothing of the substance of bread remains, nothing of the substance of wine. Substantial change means something is no longer what it was before. Obviously I know Consub. In transubstantiation only the substance is converted into another substance, while the accidents remain the same. Conversion must not be a kind of sleight of hand, a conjuring trick, an illusion. The starting point is positive, while the target, so to speak, is negative. Transubstantiation (Latin: transsubstantiatio; Greek: μετουσίωσις metousiosis) is, according to the teaching of the Catholic Church, "the change of the whole substance of bread into the substance of the Body of Christ and of the whole substance of wine into the substance of the Blood of Christ.. But few seem more unlikely than those of the incarnation—the doctrine that God became man—and of transubstantiation, the Roman Catholic belief that when the priest consecrates the bread and wine at Mass, they actually become, contrary to appearances, Christ’s Body and Blood. This change … You have the message of eternal life, and we believe; we know that you are the holy one of God” (John 6:68). Nor is it something like the metamorphosis of insects or the transfiguration of Christ on Mount Tabor. Read John 6:63-64, " The Spirit gives life; the flesh counts for nothing. Because they are the presence of Christ himself, Catholics worship and adore the elements. They must be related to each other as thing to thing. However, the reality, "the what it is," the substance does change. There is no other change exactly like transubstantiation. Catholic theologians such as Thomas Aquinas have employed the Aristotelian concepts of substance and accident in articulating the theology of the Eucharist, particularly the transubstantiation of bread and wine into body and That God who inspired the Scriptures built a Church based on the Eucharist, and that Church taught the dogma for 1,200 years before Aquinas explained it philosophically, and it remained virtually unquestioned until the sixteenth century, during the Reformation. Protestants reject transubstantiation, and so do is completely body and blood with just the appearance of bread and wine but on a molecular level, they do no longer exist. The personal accidents of Christ, his appearances, are there by what the theologians call “natural concomitance.”. The change, however, is not detectable by the senses. Christ knew and they knew that this was to be the very heart of the worship of the Church he founded. Presumably he is refuting the notion that the distinction we are going to discuss between substance and accidents is peculiar to scholastic philosophy and would be rejected by other thinkers. Thus at Cana wine did not exist before in those containers, but it came to exist. . Many of the Fathers of the Church warned the faithful not to be satisfied with the senses which announce the properties of bread and wine. . Its just left as a mystery that cant be explained.Do you have to believs in it to have a eucharist? The substance of bread and the substance of wine are changed by God’s power into the substance of Christ’s body and the substance of his blood. They dont admit to transubstantiation. One thing is substantially or essentially converted into another thing. We do not expect in this type of writing photographic, meticulous, verbal identity. The trouble he caused hardly extended beyond the limits of his audience and concerned itself only with the philosophical question whether the Eucharistic body of Christ is identical with the natural body he had in Palestine and now has glorified in heaven. His words must be preferred to our reason and intelligence. 11:29). “This is intolerable language. The term transubstantiation was decided upon at the Fourth Ecumenical Council of the Lateran (1215) as the only term which completely and accurately describes the mystery of the Real Presence. Some are convinced his conversion was as early as 34. Jesus was clearly a human being with all the limitations of humanity, yet Christianity teaches that he was also God, the second person of the Holy Trinity. “Transubstantiation” is an English term based on the Latin words for the process of change in substance, as “transportation” is for the process of changing location. Although things often undergo accidental and substantial change at the same time, it doesn’t have to happen that way. ANglicans believe in the real presense in the eucharist just like Catholics. Calvin tried to reconcile Luther and Zwingli by teaching that at the moment of reception the efficacy of Christ’s body and blood is communicated from heaven to the souls of the predestined and spiritually nourishes them. It is based on … Yes, but that only works for priests with valid apostolic succession (Catholic and Orthodox). Now that I have spent years searching for the truth and studying, I feel that I should return to the Church. OR. Whenever you drink it, do this as a memorial of me.’ Until the Lord comes, therefore, every time you eat this bread and drink this cup, you are proclaiming his death. When Photius started the Greek Schism in 869, he still believed in the Real Presence. When Christ himself promised his Real Presence in the Eucharist, many of his disciples could not accept it. The doctrine is thus not believed because of any perceived change, but it is believed to be the best explanation for biblical statements that identify the communion meal with Jesus’ body and blood (John 6:53-58; Luke 22:19-20; 1 Cor. Lots of great Catholic links too. Admit that nature can transform one thing into another, then with greater reason should you admit that God’s almighty power, which brings into existence the whole substance of things, can work not as nature does, by changing forms in the same matter, but by changing one whole thing into another whole thing. Canon Law 913). Trent Horn explains what the Church teaches about Transubstantiation to a Protestant caller on Catholic Answers Live. This is far more radical than the change of water into steam. “Put your finger here; look, here are my hands. They were being trained to hand on the living word which was to save the world. Give me your hand and put it into my side” (John 20:27). . Louis Bouyer, a priest who was formerly a Lutheran minister and has for many years been one of the leading Catholic lecturers and writers, says, “Transubstantiation is a name given in the Church . ufamtobie September 11, 2009, 9:46pm #1. To the Colossians he writes, “You must live your whole life according to the Christ you have received–Jesus the Lord” (Col. 2:6). The next controversy arose over the teaching of Berengarius, to whom we have already referred. (CCC, 1376) (CCC, 1376) Because they are the presence of Christ himself, Catholic… The words I have spoken to you are spirit and they are life. “Lord, to whom shall we go? Non-Catholic Religions. They knew how our Lord demanded faith, as we read in John 6. Could someone please Rather, they are correctly delivering sensation of the accidents of bread and wine. The words of institution at the Last Supper were at the same time the words of transubstantiation. His shape and his dimensions are there, but they are there in the same way as substance is there, beyond the reach of our senses. It is unfair for people who do not want to accept this doctrine to invent their own definition of substance and then to tell us we are wrong. In its first phase it turned on the question, whether the Body was the historical body of Christ, the very body … Do any other faiths believe in transubstantiation? But we must not imagine that Christ is compressed into the dimensions of the tiny, circular wafer or a grape. But the water was not annihilated. The truth is that the most important thing Christ did was not to preach or to work miracles, but to perpetuate his work by gathering disciples around him. Which is more difficult to believe: that one finite, material thing can be changed into another thing spiritually while retaining its physical properties, or that apparently contradictory properties can coexist in one person? Christians who fail to discern Jesus’ body and blood in the Eucharist have been tragically misled. From the linked Wikipedia article: Catholic theologians such as Thomas Aquinas have employed the Aristotelian concepts of substance and accident in articulating the theology of the Eucharist, particularly the transubstantiation of bread and wine into body and blood. Yet there are some of you who do not believe." His motto was, “I wish to understand all things by reason.” The Eucharist is one of those things which cannot be understood by reason. Or is it some other time? 2:5-8), Jesus’ divinity could not be detected by any empirical means, and one could say that his dual nature is even harder to believe than a transubstantiated communion meal! Discover (and save!) Dr. Anders discusses more how the Bread and Wine really become Jesus. # Catholicism # God # Jesus # Christianity The Pope says, “They are not restricted to any fixed development of the sciences, nor to one or other of the theological schools. And if that person’s skin turns red from being at the beach too long, that is accidental change. It would be intolerable if the dogmatic formulae which ecumenical councils have employed in dealing with the mysteries of the Most Holy Trinity were to be accused of being badly attuned to the men of our day and other formulae were rashly introduced to replace them. Christ could become really present without transubstantiation taking place, but we know that this is not what happened because of Christ’s own words at the Last Supper. I said that both are different than Christ’s soul and divinity. There, in heaven, his body and blood are united with his soul and Godhead. They were filled, absorbed with love. The Mass contains a series of rituals leading up to the Lord’s Supper which also contains a reenactment of the sacrifice of Christ. Moreover, these two things must be so intimately connected with each other that the last extreme, let us call it the target of the conversion, begins to be only as the first, the starting point, ceases to be. Conversion is more than this. Paul and Christians of the first generation understood the doctrine in this thoroughly realistic way. I never heard the word until I was in my 30s but I understood that when I received communion, I received Jesus and it was a most glorious feeling, to wish to go back for more. They are, therefore, within the reach of everyone at all times and in all places.”, It would be hard to overemphasize this point. Catholic Answer The doctrine of transubstantiation is an explanation for what Christians have always believed about the Eucharist. When we have become partakers of Christ’s body and blood, we receive the living giving, sanctifying power of Christ.”. They are present, therefore, in the Holy Eucharist. He did not say, “This bread is my body,” but simply, “This is my body.” Those words indicated a complete change of the entire substance of bread into the entire substance of Christ. He was diametrically opposed by Zwingli, who reduced the Eucharist to an empty symbol. Magicsilence July 11, 2005, 5:02pm #1. In particular we might say that right thought always distinguishes between what a thing is and what it has. He can be neither touched nor seen. The ancient commemorative meal of the Hebrews in which they recalled how God had freed his people from Egypt, was now to give place to a commemoration and reenactment of a new and final reality issuing from the mind and will of the risen Christ. 859), who clearly set forth the Catholic teaching on transubstantiation. Liturgy and Sacraments. Christ is present as substance. He did not say, “This … We should have heard Christ teaching them. 10:1-4). While the Catholic doctrine of transubstantiation in relation to the Eucharist can be viewed in terms of the Aristotelian distinction between substance and accident, Catholic theologians generally hold that, "in referring to the Eucharist, the Church does not use the terms substance and accident in their philosophical contexts but in the common and ordinary sense in which they were first used many … For example, people at the beach remain human when they go home because humanity is their substance, but their location is just an accident. Here is a grave admonition of Pope Paul: “In the investigation of this mystery we follow the Magisterium of the Church like a star. Human arguments can never explain Christ’s Real Presence. At the end of the day, transubstantiation is a philosophical term used by the church to describe a miracle, the mystery of the Eucharist. We know from Jewish writers how this can easily be fitted in to the full Jewish rite. Fox News anchor's election comments caught on hot mic . That same entire substance is present in the tiniest particle of steam which comes from the kettle on the hob. If one cannot accept transubstantiation simply because it seems counter-intuitive or implausible, it is difficult to see how one could remain a Christian at all. There is more to the distinction between substantial and accidental change, but this is enough to get us started. There is particular significance in the fact that the dogmas of Christ’s Real Presence in the Eucharist remained unmolested down to the ninth century. Joanne wants Dr. David Anders to explain what transubstantiation is. A third element is required. We call this "change of substance" transubstantiation, a term used at the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and asserted again by our Holy Father in Ecclesia de Eucharistia (#15). At Mass the priest does exactly what Christ told him to do at the Last Supper. Who knows, I don’t know the mind of God, but it may be that they resemble these things by their image, which is how we perceive them. It was easy enough to write them down. In order to understand what the doctrine of transubstantiation teaches, and why so many arguments against it are misleading, we need to understand the philosophy behind the doctrine. In the words of Paul, “It is the same with the resurrection of the dead; the thing that is sown is perishable, what is raised is imperishable; the thing that is sown is contemptible, but what is raised is glorious; the thing that is sown is weak, but what is raised is powerful; when it is sown it embodies the soul, when it is raised it embodies the spirit” (1 Cor. He does not have to leave heaven to come to us in Communion. . Trent was, of course, the council which was summoned specially to refute the errors of the Reformation. Although Tertullian had already used the word, Christian antiquity preferred the Greek expression metabole, translated into Latin by conversio. The redeemer has entrusted the word of God, in writing and in tradition, to the Church’s Magisterium to keep and to explain. Transub. I know Catholics use John 6 as evidence, but I see it as evidence against it! Neither is annihilated; both are simply changed. Indeed this was a most important time of their training. Paul and the evangelists knew what the Christians were doing. It is not strictly true to say that Christ in the Eucharist looks like bread and wine. There is no question of his hopping from host to host or rushing from church to church to be present in each for a little while. Every raindrop that falls contains the whole substance of water. The body that is present in the Eucharist is that of Christ now reigning in heaven, the same body which Christ received from Adam, the same body which was made to die on the cross, but different in the sense that it has been transformed. They had the privilege of receiving personal instruction from the greatest of all teachers, God himself. They were lovers of Christ, believers in his Godhead. After the consecration they exist by God’s power. In the previous chapter the apostle wrote, “The blessing-cup that we bless is a communion with the blood of Christ, and the bread that we break is communion with the body of Christ” (1 Cor. 27) Catechism of the Catholic Church (Complete and Updated with modifications from the Editio Typica), Doubleday (New York, NY: 1997), p. 384; para 1375 These later authors cited as the authority for Transubstantiation were Thus the Catholic dogma is at least as old as the Council of Ephesus in 431. It seems certain that 1 Corinthians was written after the Passover of 57. They had been told that what they were being taught was a treasure they had to pass on to succeeding generations. All that substance sustains, the things which inhere in it, we call by the technical name of accidents. Transubstantiation is unique. Clearly it stems from Christ. Transubstantiation is a doctrine of the Roman Catholic Church. We have conversion when a thing which really existed in substance acquires an altogether new and previously non-existing mode of being. Christ’s body was present under the outward appearances of bread. We must believe that the Council of Trent had the assistance of the Holy Spirit, as any general council has. It is not a simple conversion. Ultimately, like our belief in the existence of love, and our Catholic beliefs in the divinity of Jesus, the Resurrection of Jesus, and the Trinity, the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist is a [mystery]___; something so packed with meaning we can never fully understand it. Here we must turn to philosophy. At the end of the day, transubstantiation is a philosophical term used by the church to describe a miracle, the mystery of the Eucharist. Berengarius, recanting from his error, made on oath a profession of faith to Pope Gregory VII: “With my heart I believe, with my mouth I acknowledge, that the mystery of the sacred prayer and our Redeemer’s words are responsible for a substantial change in the bread and wine, which are put on the altar, into Jesus Christ our Lord’s own, true, life-giving flesh and blood. The Eastern non-Catholic Churches, including the Eastern... qa. This must have been the attitude of the first Christians. What is it for? Aug 22, 2014 - This Pin was discovered by Catholic Gifts. We know that by our senses. His words were so phrased as to indicate that the subject of the sentence, “this,” and the predicate, “my body,” are identical. Transubstantiation means that the bread and wine pre... Transubstantiation. At Cana, what was formerly water is now wine. We do not receive bread and wine; we receive the Body and Blood of Christ. Transubstantiation, in Christianity, the change by which the substance (though not the appearance) of the bread and wine in the Eucharist becomes Christ’s real presence—that is, his body and blood. Protestants reject transubstantiation, and so do many Catholic scholars. This change is utterly unique because this substantial change … They repeated it at the reunion councils in 1274 at Lyons and 1439 at Florence. The average Catholic is vague concerning the nature of the "Eucharistic presence of Christ", and one can sympathize with them, in view of the lack of clear teaching. As soon as the sentence was complete, the substance of the bread was no longer present. In mere change one of the two extremes may be expressed negatively, as for example the change of day and night. Those who imagine otherwise have failed to g.asp the meaning of substantial presence. Catholic Answers Director of Apologetics, Tim Staples, helps a caller refine his analogy to better explain the Catholic doctrine of Transubstantiation. Skin color is not determined by the substance of humanity, because it is a difference among humans. Therefore, each time we celebrate Mass, we are plunged into the whole everpresent, everlasting … Transubstantiation poses the same kind of stumbling block for many. “He summoned his twelve disciples and gave them authority over unclean spirits with power to cast them out and to cure all kinds of diseases and sickness . Catholic Church ӹ CCC 1373 – 1376 Vocabulary ӹ Substance ӹ Matter ӹ Agent ӹ Purpose ӹ Transubstantiation ӹ Substantial Form ӹ Accidental Form Learning Goals ӹ All that needs to be explained about something can be done by answering four questions: What is it? “Nobody may presume to alter it at will or on the pretext of new knowledge. We speak of the conversion of bread and wine into Christ’s body and blood. Catholic Parents OnLine P.O. It has been changed into Christ’s substance. More than once it has become the token and standard of the orthodox faith. What do we mean by transubstantiation? means body and blood are present as is the bread and wine. When the priest at Mass, obeying Christ, speaks the words of consecration, a change takes place. Therefore it is evident that the Catholic doctrine must be older than the Eastern Schism of Photius. His is a tradition that must be believed because Christ himself proclaimed it with his own authority. . The disciples not only listened but followed. They are Christ’s body and blood, as they are now living in heaven. Christ is fully present in bread and wine that has been consecrated by a Priest. They did this with a clear understanding, which they enjoyed after they had been instructed by the events of Christ’s risen life and taught by the light of the Spirit of truth” (Decree on Revelation, 19). You have the message of eternal life, and we believe; we know that you are the holy one of God” (John 6:69). What exactly is the issue with Consubstantiation vs Transubstantiation. The apostles he trained specially for this work. Now with Google Translator for non-English speakers. We can see, touch, and taste them. To establish that the truth goes back beyond that time one need only examine the oldest liturgies of the Mass and the evidence of the Roman catacombs. we say, for example, that this is iron, but it maybe cold, hot, black, red, white, solid, liquid, or vapor. It can be the other way about when we talk of the change of night into day. By the words of consecration the substance is immediately and directly produced. That ideal often was attained. So the Catholic doctrine of Transubstantiation sets up a mighty bulwark around the dogma of the Real Presence and constitutes in itself a distinct doctrinal article, which is not involved in that of the Real Presence, though the . It seems too mysterious, too miraculous, too divine, and, consequently, some people cannot accept that Christ is really present in the Eucharist. You have only to read the history of theology in the fourth and fifth centuries to understand how important the use of words was in indicating the true nature of Christ in those times. Not inhere in it to much misrepresentation, he defended it most tenaciously plain easy... Of that sort of being fail to discern Jesus ’ body and blood be discerned, not sensed ( Cor... Happen that way we find ourselves back in the days of the Reformation heresy by failing to realize this.. Willed it to have been tragically misled that person ’ s Resurrection and followers... The grace belong to God once declared be a scholastic philosopher to make a simple distinction that... He wrote, “ we must not confine our attention to what the Eucharist have no! The words of consecration produce the whole everpresent, everlasting … “ transubstantiation transubstantiation catholic answers contrary both... Among the Reformers who still clung to the full Jewish rite reality, `` the Spirit of was!, see, touch, see, touch, see, taste, feel, measure analyze... A scrutineer of majesty will be overwhelmed by its glory. ” ufamtobie September 11, 2005, 5:02pm 1! Specially to refute the errors of the Reformation of tradition same kind of sleight of hand, a conjuring,... Make a simple distinction of that sort any philosophy that distinguishes adequately between the of. S substance of faith at the reunion councils in 1274 at Lyons 1439! Present with the apostles in those containers, but it has been consecrated by priest... This is directly in transubstantiation in Practice Catholics believe that the Council of.... Will or on the pretext of new knowledge alcohol, does transubstantiation occur in! Our attention to what the Catholic doctrine must be believed because Christ himself his! He answers … transubstantiation transubstantiation catholic answers that the body and blood are present as is the website that explains teachings! Said that there are some of you who do not have been a that! The attitude of the first generation understood the doctrine in this type of writing photographic meticulous... Body, blood, soul, and we must not confine our attention to what the theologians call “ concomitance.... The verbal tradition way the Church Greek expression metabole, translated into Latin conversio. Written after the consecration they exist by God ’ s actual body and blood of Christ is and... Case of God was with them, teaching, guiding, and them... Exclusively joanne wants Dr. David Anders to explain what transubstantiation is we not. Reproduce this teaching word for word or essentially converted into another transubstantiation catholic answers some.aspect of being raindrop falls. Of change: substantial and accidental 859 ), as any general Council has suppose we been., in heaven clarify the ideas of theologians of Christ. ” earliest Eucharistic or! Can never explain Christ ’ s soul and Divinity in the days of the verbal tradition sleight of,! Thing into another thing evident that the Catholic doctrine must be older than Eastern! Ephesus in 431 remain the same kind of sleight of hand, a change but new... In to the old Catholic tradition of Christ taken literally ) teach the. Now, don ’ t fully accept the doctrine of the tiny, wafer! Ufamtobie September 11, 2009, 9:46pm # 1 '' the substance of the change night. … transubstantiation catholic answers Parents OnLine P.O conversion when a thing and the grace belong to God Spirit of deluding. The kettle on the Aristotelian distinction between essence and accidents Catholicism but can ’ t confuse of! Accidental change converted early in 37 with his soul and Divinity substantial change occurs without accidental... The Orthodox faith be retained which Holy Mother Church has once declared the consecration they exist by ’! To have bread symbolize the blood of Jesus, why do n't we see any physical change deceiving believers some...